Gemma Grimmer's A2 Language Coursework Blog
This blog details my work through my A2 English Language Coursework task.
Monday, 20 October 2014
Secondary Research
Today I have made a start by looking in detail at the Oxford Reading Tree websites. It has been heavy going and at times I don't really understand what's being said - but I'm working on it! I'm beginning to gain a better understanding of the progression through the series from "Floppy Phonics" to "Decode and Develop" and how classroom activities can support children and expand upon these books. I expect we'll be set our next task of sourcing this secondary material later this week so hopefully I will be able to get started straight away!
Thursday, 16 October 2014
Introduction Draft 2
Introduction
For my English Language investigation, I
will be looking at Children’s Language Acquisition, in particular, the
developing language complexity of children’s books, specifically the Oxford
Reading Tree graded reading scheme. Language becomes increasingly difficult as
children progress through the reading schemes; therefore I will compare how
language complexity occurs. I believe that I will find significant variety between
the sentence and overall book length, grammar, vocabulary used and complexity
of consonant clusters as the books progress.
Hypothesis
I hypothesise that as the reading scheme
books progress, there will be a gradual increase in the complexity of the
following features:
·
Sentence length
(as children become more familiar with sentence formation)
·
Overall book
length (when their attention span increases)
·
Grammar (more
complex, concrete nouns, adjectives and verb tenses)
·
Vocabulary (wider
range of words used to broaden a child’s vocabulary)
·
Repetition of
words (this will allow them to learn their meanings faster [1])
·
Consonant
clusters (more difficult to develop the letter-sound relationship)
Methodology
I have chosen a selection of books from the
Oxford Reading Tree scheme because these books are used nationwide to teach
children to read. I have selected the Magic Key book series as these books are
iconic and well-known as they follow the adventures of Biff, Chip and Kipper.
“These books were first published in 1985 and there are now over 300 stories
which form part
of an English language syllabus in line with the National Curriculum, designed
to help children learn to speak and read Standard English.” [2]
There are no ethical issues with gathering
this data as it is part of a public domain and therefore already accessible to
a wider audience. The books I have chosen will be a representative sample owing
to them being a part of a nationwide reading scheme, used in over “80% of
schools” [2]. I have chosen six
books, three traditional Biff, Chip and Kipper books and three decode and
develop Biff, Chip and Kipper books. There is one traditional and one
contemporary book from each colour band, yellow, blue and green.
For my secondary research, I will
predominantly use search engines to research about how reading schemes become
more complex in their formation to assist children’s reading progression within
school. I will also use examples from relevant theories, such as imitation from
Skinner’s behaviourist theory and the notion of language scaffolding from
Vygotsky to explain hoe language gradually develops. Piaget’s use of
stimulation will also be explored in the graphology of the book. I shall also
access scholarly articles and books focusing on how language in children’s
books becomes more complex as they learn to read. I will need this information
to understand how reading schemes work and to understand why the progressions
occur in that particular order, such as the length of sentences increasing
before vocabulary. Once I have this secondary data, I will ensure that I have a
sample of data from a variety of mediums and that I only include relevant
details in my actual investigation. I plan to use the “method” structure for
analysing my data, for example, I will analyse the sentence length each book
before moving on to grammar.
[1] Chard, D & Osborn, J. (2004)Word
Recognition Instruction [online]. UK: WETA [16/10/14]
[2] Wikipedia (2014) The
Magic Key [online]. UK: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
License [06/10/14]
Introduction Draft 1
Introduction
For my English Language investigation, I
will be looking at Children’s Language Acquisition, in particular, the
developing language complexity of children’s books. My secondary research will
be obtained through search engines and information on reading schemes.
Experience has shown that language becomes increasingly difficult as children
progress through the reading schemes; therefore I will compare how language
complexity occurs. I believe that I will find significant variety between the
sentence and overall book length, grammar, vocabulary used and consonant
clusters.
Hypothesis
I hypothesise that as children progress
through the reading scheme books, there will be a gradual increase in the
complexity of the following features:
·
Sentence length
(as children become more familiar with simple conjunctions)
·
Overall book
length (when their attention span increases)
·
Grammar (more
complex, concrete nouns, adjectives and verb tenses)
·
Vocabulary (wider
range of words used to broaden a child’s vocabulary)
·
Repetition of
words (children need between 4 – 14 exposures to recognise a word)
·
Consonant
clusters (more difficult to develop the letter-sound relationship)
Methodology
In order to obtain this data I shall contact
a local infant school and ask to borrow a variety of Oxford Reading Tree scheme
books for a short time. Once I have the books I will photocopy each book so I
will have a hard copy to annotate and use. Furthermore, I will scan these paper
copies onto my computer so I will be able to access, annotate and copy sections
of text to use in my investigation.
There are no ethical issues with gathering
this data as it is part of a public domain and therefore already accessible to
a wider audience. The books I have chosen will be a representative sample owing
to them being a part of a nationwide reading scheme.
For my secondary research, I will
predominantly use search engines to research about how reading schemes help
children to read and any theorists who have looked into the development of
complexity within different books in a children’s reading scheme books. I shall
also access scholarly articles and books focusing on how language in children’s
books becomes more complex as they learn to read. I will need this information
to understand how reading schemes work and to understand why the progressions
occur in that particular order, such as the length of sentences increasing
before vocabulary. Once I have this secondary data, I will ensure that I have a
sample of data from a variety of mediums and that I only include relevant
details in my actual investigation. I plan to use the “method” structure for
analysing my data, for example, I will analyse the sentence length each book
before moving on to grammar.
Introduction
I've been quite lax with my posts so I thought with an
impending deadline I'd keep you up to date. Last month we had a lesson in which
we learnt the correct content for our introduction sections. This included
detail on our investigation topic and what we would actually be looking at. For
our hypothesis, and methodology sections we had to include relevant linking to
theorists as well as stating how we were going to select a representative
sample of data. Luckily Jill gave us an example sheet to fill in
beforehand!
The next week we handed in our drafts and later that week we received them back with loads of feedback. Jill stressed the importance of stating that the project was language based but I had put this in my introduction so I didn't have to worry! However I still had plenty of improvements to make! My feedback included more specification on the type of books and theorists I had written about as well as needing to state why I had chosen to something.
I've made all my amendments and will post a copy of both my first and second drafts.
The next week we handed in our drafts and later that week we received them back with loads of feedback. Jill stressed the importance of stating that the project was language based but I had put this in my introduction so I didn't have to worry! However I still had plenty of improvements to make! My feedback included more specification on the type of books and theorists I had written about as well as needing to state why I had chosen to something.
I've made all my amendments and will post a copy of both my first and second drafts.
Tuesday, 16 September 2014
Action Plan notes
During my meeting with Jill I wrote some notes and information about what I need to do an to look for within my coursework. I've included them below so you will have an idea of what I need to do in order to analyse my data:
Data collection:
- It's likely that I will use the 'Oxford Reading Tree' as my reading scheme.
- 1st formal year at school: Year 1 – start to finish
- 3/5 books at 3/5 different levels
- How many colours will children progress through
What I'll look for:
- Complexity
- Grammar
- Vocabulary
- Complexity of vocabulary
- Sentence length
- Phonics
- Recognise consonant clusters (BR – brick, brown, broken)
Data location:
- Allied reading for pleasure books – library
- Borrow books from first schools – can photocopy books at college
Secondary research:
- Research development of children’s literacy
- How are children taught to read through teachers and the reading scheme
- How are skills scaffolded
- East Norfolk English Language Blog
- Secondary research – theory behind the books to help me analyse them more intelligently
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)